Never a doubt in my mind that one would get passed over.
I too can set traps
No as far as the second goes it should remain as was intended, the intention was to make sure that the govt could not mow down Americas with unfair force like they did with the Indians who only used bows and arrows. Speaking of that, the govt prosecuted those who fairly traded with the Indians and gave them firearms. Still think the govt is looking after your good side? Actually, since the indians were here first, it could be said that they were more covered by the 2nd than we were. But then again, those who have the superior firepower against defenseless victims always win.
That in itself is a good reason not to let some motor mouth politician control one or either of the two biggest amendments, the freedom to speak and the freedom to defend oneself. Probably a damn good reason they were 1 and 2 on the wish list when they wrote it down.
Now it is also a law but it is a Commandment in the big 10, "Thou shalt not kill" . These scumbags do not care about laws or Commandments so what is writing one more going to do? It will punish those who follow the laws.