Registered Member
Sporter contour, yes, mcmillan. I dont do it at 100 (vertical string) so signs point to shooter errorI would blame input bias because I sometimes find myself cheating by trying to sneak a little closer to the holes I see, but you cant see those tiny holes at 600 with my equipment. I think I might have been snuggling up to the gun a little more in an attempt to hold the muzzle down so I could watch the impact dust cloud.
"Back after 5 years. I thought you had died.
don"
Splitting my time between the montane and the mesas
The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.
Registered Member
Like Dave said, plenty good! I doubt I could even see the target, even with a good scope, at 600 yards!
The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible - Arthur C. Clarke
Registered Member
That would do it...Trying to fight recoil is self-defeating...A heavier barrel might improve groups, but would also be a lot to tougher to tote since it is a hunting tool...Still at 600 yards, that group is adequate for an elk hunt, no problem...Originally Posted by CactusCurt
...Ben
The future is forged on the anvil of history...The interpreter of history wields the hammer... - Unknown author...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote